<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schools: dipsticks and demonstration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/archives/682/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/archives/682</link>
	<description>Dave Ferguson&#039;s interests, ideas, notions, tangents</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:43:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/archives/682/comment-page-1#comment-9867</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/?p=682#comment-9867</guid>
		<description>Matthew, for me there&#039;s been a logical and steady progression: training &#8594; learning &#8594; performance.

The first centers much more on the content and the instructor (even if it&#039;s computer-based); the second, more on the individual; the third, on the individual at work.

The challenge is reducing the problem of &lt;em&gt;transfer&lt;/em&gt; -- or, even better, connecting the learning experience so clearly and directly to the job that &quot;training&quot; doesn&#039;t seem like an outside event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew, for me there&#8217;s been a logical and steady progression: training &rarr; learning &rarr; performance.</p>
<p>The first centers much more on the content and the instructor (even if it&#8217;s computer-based); the second, more on the individual; the third, on the individual at work.</p>
<p>The challenge is reducing the problem of <em>transfer</em> &#8212; or, even better, connecting the learning experience so clearly and directly to the job that &#8220;training&#8221; doesn&#8217;t seem like an outside event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Bibby</title>
		<link>http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/archives/682/comment-page-1#comment-9866</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Bibby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 08:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/?p=682#comment-9866</guid>
		<description>Great post Dave - what really bought the message home for me was &quot;you want to see what kids have learned, give them a project&quot;.  

In face to face training there are many activities that are used (games, theatrical projects, poster presentations etc.) that play an important role in knowledge retention.  Unfortunately these types of activities are often not included in elearning.  You have got me thinking now . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Dave &#8211; what really bought the message home for me was &#8220;you want to see what kids have learned, give them a project&#8221;.  </p>
<p>In face to face training there are many activities that are used (games, theatrical projects, poster presentations etc.) that play an important role in knowledge retention.  Unfortunately these types of activities are often not included in elearning.  You have got me thinking now . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
