<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Upfront about the backchannel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/archives/1548/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/archives/1548</link>
	<description>Dave Ferguson&#039;s interests, ideas, notions, tangents</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:43:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tamar Weinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/archives/1548/comment-page-1#comment-12030</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamar Weinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/?p=1548#comment-12030</guid>
		<description>:)  I think EVERYONE did it, Dave!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:)  I think EVERYONE did it, Dave!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/archives/1548/comment-page-1#comment-12028</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/?p=1548#comment-12028</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Tamar, and my apologies to Olivia... that was my too-hasty read.  I&#039;ve corrected my post, and I hope Olivia still appreciates the enthusiastic reception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Tamar, and my apologies to Olivia&#8230; that was my too-hasty read.  I&#8217;ve corrected my post, and I hope Olivia still appreciates the enthusiastic reception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamar Weinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/archives/1548/comment-page-1#comment-12027</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamar Weinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/?p=1548#comment-12027</guid>
		<description>Actually, I didn&#039;t write the post.  Olivia Mitchell did -- and I acknowledge it in the first sentence as she guest-wrote that post for the Touchbase blog and I&#039;m the editor so I posted it.  Hope that clarifies. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I didn&#8217;t write the post.  Olivia Mitchell did &#8212; and I acknowledge it in the first sentence as she guest-wrote that post for the Touchbase blog and I&#8217;m the editor so I posted it.  Hope that clarifies. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sacha Chua</title>
		<link>http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/archives/1548/comment-page-1#comment-12026</link>
		<dc:creator>Sacha Chua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/?p=1548#comment-12026</guid>
		<description>Monitoring the backchannel: This is easier to do yourself when you&#039;re doing a fully virtual presentation, because you&#039;re not worried about breaking eye contact with people. I&#039;m a firm believer in having a backchannel for virtual presentations - Q&amp;A over the phone gets awkward, and fully moderated questions can be limited and frustrating. The tool I use at work - Sametime Unyte - does this pretty well. I find that typing and talking are impossible for me to do at the same time! ;) However, I often keep an eye on the backchannel, weaving those comments and questions into my talk. That&#039;s easier. 

As for real life: I may try using my iPod Touch to quickly scan through the backchannel when I take water breaks... =) But yes, definitely, assigning someone to watch the backchannel in real-life talks is a great idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monitoring the backchannel: This is easier to do yourself when you&#8217;re doing a fully virtual presentation, because you&#8217;re not worried about breaking eye contact with people. I&#8217;m a firm believer in having a backchannel for virtual presentations &#8211; Q&amp;A over the phone gets awkward, and fully moderated questions can be limited and frustrating. The tool I use at work &#8211; Sametime Unyte &#8211; does this pretty well. I find that typing and talking are impossible for me to do at the same time! ;) However, I often keep an eye on the backchannel, weaving those comments and questions into my talk. That&#8217;s easier. </p>
<p>As for real life: I may try using my iPod Touch to quickly scan through the backchannel when I take water breaks&#8230; =) But yes, definitely, assigning someone to watch the backchannel in real-life talks is a great idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/archives/1548/comment-page-1#comment-12020</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/?p=1548#comment-12020</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link, Dave.  Now we&#039;ve got four or five people sharing what they&#039;ve done with these.  I love the smell of induction in the morning.

In the back of my mind, I was moving away from the stereotypical presentation at a conference (which 80% of the time is one-to-many, with questions).  So if you alternate types of interaction (talk, questions, activities, whatever)--because your purpose allows or encourages that--it&#039;s all the easier to fit your chat break into the mix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, Dave.  Now we&#8217;ve got four or five people sharing what they&#8217;ve done with these.  I love the smell of induction in the morning.</p>
<p>In the back of my mind, I was moving away from the stereotypical presentation at a conference (which 80% of the time is one-to-many, with questions).  So if you alternate types of interaction (talk, questions, activities, whatever)&#8211;because your purpose allows or encourages that&#8211;it&#8217;s all the easier to fit your chat break into the mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
